Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:19:39.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual organisms as units of analysis: Bayesian-clustering alternatives in population genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2005

JUDITH E. MANK
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
JOHN C. AVISE
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Population genetic analyses traditionally focus on the frequencies of alleles or genotypes in ‘populations’ that are delimited a priori. However, there are potential drawbacks of amalgamating genetic data into such composite attributes of assemblages of specimens: genetic information on individual specimens is lost or submerged as an inherent part of the analysis. A potential also exists for circular reasoning when a population's initial identification and subsequent genetic characterization are coupled. In principle, these problems are circumvented by some newer methods of population identification and individual assignment based on statistical clustering of specimen genotypes. Here we evaluate a recent method in this genre – Bayesian clustering – using four genotypic data sets involving different types of molecular markers in non-model organisms from nature. As expected, measures of population genetic structure (FST and ΦST) tended to be significantly greater in Bayesian a posteriori data treatments than in analyses where populations were delimited a priori. In the four biological contexts examined, which involved both geographic population structures and hybrid zones, Bayesian clustering was able to recover differentiated populations, and Bayesian assignments were able to identify likely population sources of specific individuals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press