Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:24:23.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objects and Senses and Substitutions: A Reply to Dwyer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Robert J. Stainton
Robert J. Stainton
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions/Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , Summer 2000 , pp. 593 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beany, Michael 1997 The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Phil 1998 Review of Philosophical Perspectives on Language, Dialogue, 37: 611–13.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1982 Varieties of Reference. Edited by McDowell, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1892 “On Sinn and Bedeutung.” Reprinted in Beany 1997, pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1919 “Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter.” Reprinted in Beany 1997, pp. 362–67.Google Scholar
Stainton, Robert J. 1996 Philosophical Perspectives on Language. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.Google Scholar