Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:21:41.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Historian's Approach to Theology

Theology's Role in History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Willis B. Glover
Willis B. Glover
Affiliation:
Mercer University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Basil Willey in the introductory chapter of his Seventeenth Century Background calls attention to the fact that the rise of scientific humanism introduced a basic dichotomy into the intellectual and religious life of that century. A new pattern of explanation came to dominate Western thought in the seventeenth century, and it was destined to continue without being effectively challenged until the twentieth. For three centuries it was assumed that reality was a closed system of law, and no explanation was satisfactory which did not make clear the efficient causation operating within this closed system. Epistemological studies, to be sure, developed within this period a radical skepticism regarding the validity of man's knowledge of ultimate reality; but not even Hume or Kant succeeded in conceiving of reality as essentially dynamic. The early nineteenth century witnessed a reaction against the static rationalism of the previous age. Emphasis came to be put on movement, development, evolution. Things were explained, not by direct relation to a nexus of fixed laws, but by descriptions of how they came to be.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1956 , pp. 291 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Willey, Basil, The Seventeenth Century Background (New York: Columbia University Press, 1934).Google Scholar

2. Lovejoy, Arthur O., “The Parallel of Deism and Classicism,” Essays in the History of Ideas (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1948), pp. 79–83.Google Scholar

3. Davis, Robert Gorham, “In a Raveled World Love Endures,” New York Times Book Review, 12 26, 1954, p. 13.Google Scholar

4. Wolfe, Thomas, A Stone, A Leaf, A Door, selected and arranged in verse by Barnes, John S. (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1945), p. 1.Google Scholar

5. Sir Jeans, James, The Mysterious Universe (New York: Macmillan Company, 1932)Google Scholar; Sullivan, John W. N., The Limitations of Science (New York: The New American Library of World Literature, 1933).Google Scholar

6. Cf. Niebuhr, Reinhold, The Self and the Dramas of History (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1955), pp. 109–111Google Scholar; and Tillich, Paul J., “The World Situation,” The Christian Answer, Van Dusen, Henry P., ed., (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1948), pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

7. Stephen, Leslie, History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century (2nd ed., London, 1881), II, 414–415.Google Scholar

8. Pattison, Mark, “Tendencies of Religious Thought in England, 1688–1750,” Essays and Reviews (London, 1860), pp. 259–264.Google Scholar

9. Niebuhr, H. Richard, Christ and Culture (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951), pp. 110, 113–115, and 143Google Scholar. See also Niebuhr, Reinhold, Self and the Dramas of History, pp. 155–156Google Scholar; and Faith and History (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1951), p. 32.Google Scholar

10. On the religious sterility of liberalism compare Niebuhr, Self and the Dramas of History, p. 147. Students of English history as diverse in perspective as Lecky, Halévy, Somervell, and Ensor have recognized the widespread effects of Evangelicalism on nineteenth-century English society. I do not think the social effects of any liberal Christian movement have loomed so large in modern history. I am assuming, of course, that French democracy in men like Michelet and Qujnet was humanistic rather than Christian in origin. It is a curious thing that Christian faith has had most effect on the general culture when it has not been primarily concerned with social idealism. A proper investigation of this matter would involve the whole question of soeial dynamics, a field which has not as yet been sufficiently explored by theologians or historians. Tillich's concept of the relation of Protestantism to secularism is relevant here (Tillich, Paul, The Protestant Era, tr. by Adams, James Luther [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948], p. 220Google Scholar). After all, the individual is most Christinn when as a forgiven sinner he turns his attention outward to concrete problems and not when he is self-consciously striving to be Christian. Perhaps the approach of the church to the general society should also be that of interest in concrete problems rather than criticism from the perspective of some allegedly Christian ideal such as democratic egalitarianism elevated to a moral absolute.

11. Cf. Williams, Daniel Day, What Present-Day Theologians Are Thinking (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1952), p. 25.Google Scholar

12. Cf. Meland, Bernard Eugene, The Reawakening of Christian Faith (New York: Macmillan Company, 1949), pp. 73–74.Google Scholar

13. Niebuhr, , Self and the Dramas of History, pp. 41–42 and 61–72.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., pp. 51–52, 91, 111, and 230; Faith and History, p. 98. The Nature and Destiny of Man (New York: Charles Seribner's Sons, 1943), II, 166 and 205–206.Google Scholar

15. Kerygma and Myth, ed. by Hans Werner Bartsch, tr. by Reginald H. Fuller (London: S.P.C.K., 1954), pp. 3–5 and 197.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., pp. 34, 197, and 199. Cf. Whitehead, Alfred North, Science and the Modern World (New York: Macmillan, 1925), Chapter V.Google Scholar

17. Kerygma and Myth, pp. 34, 38, and 39.

18. Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), I, 261–263.Google Scholar

19. Caleb Fleming, an English Unitarian of the early eighteenth century who was concerned to defend Providence from the deists, admitted that God never violated the natural laws he had established; he argued, however, that some things were not governed by any of these laws but were subject to the immediate will of God. One example of such free areas was the wind, which, as the scriptures say, “bloweth where it listeth,” that is, where God pleases. Fleming, Caleb, Remarks on Mr. Thomas Chubb's Vindication of His True Gospel (London, 1739), p. 62.Google Scholar

20. Tillich, , Systematic Theology, I, 261–263.Google Scholar

21. Manschreck, Clyde, “Why We Do Not Pray,” Christian Century, LXX (09 23, 1953), 1077–1078Google Scholar. Tillich, , Systematic Theology, I, 267.Google Scholar

22. Niebuhr, , The Nature and Destiny of Man, II, 50Google Scholar. Cf. Niebuhr, Richard, Christ and Culture, pp. 185 and 195.Google Scholar

23. As Daniel Day Williams points out, the dualism between time and eternity is Greek rather than Hebraic in origin. Op cit., p. 40.

24. Cullmann, Oscar, Christ and Time, tr. by Filson, Floyd V. (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1950), PP. 49, 51, 62, 68, and 144–145Google Scholar. Cf. Niebuhr, , Nature and Destiny of Man, II, 287.Google Scholar

25. Niebuhr, , Nature and Destiny of Man, II, 301 and 309Google Scholar. Cf. Bultmann, in Kerygma and Myth, p. 5.Google Scholar

26. Niebuhr is so thoroughly aware of this problem (Nature and Destiny of Man, II, p. 309, footnote 12Google Scholar) that I am tempted to doubt my own criticism of him and wonder if I have properly understood his position.

27. Niebuhr, , Christ and Culture, pp. 32–33 and 157.Google Scholar

28. Cf. Dodd, C. H., The Bible Today (Cambridge University Press, 1952), pp. 142–143.Google Scholar

29. Niebuhr, , Nature and Destiny of Man, II, 301 and 315–321.Google Scholar

30. Cullmann, op. cit. Cf. Muilenburg, James, “The History of the Religion of Israel,” Interpreter's Bible (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury, 1952), I, 294.Google Scholar

31. Augustine, Saint, The City of God, tr. by Pods, Marcus, Library, Modern ed. (New York: Random House, 1950), p. 477.Google Scholar

32. Knox, John, On the Meaning of Christ (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1947), pp. 97–106.Google Scholar

33. Brunner, H. Emil, The Misunderstanding of the Church (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953.)Google Scholar

34. Niebulir, , Christ ansi Culture, pp. 194–196, 228, and 235–236.Google Scholar

35. Dawson, Christopher, Religion and the Rise of Western Culture (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1950).Google Scholar

36. Cf. Niebuhr, , Christ and Culture, p. 11.Google Scholar

37. Tillich, , The Protestant Era, pp. xvi, 57, and 141.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., pp. xvi, and 58–61.

39. Ibid., pp. 210–211, 213, and 220.

40. Historians are not always aware of the degree to which they are committed to the same faith. An interesting example is Carl Becker's recapitulation in his own experience of that persistent devotion to an undermined faith which he had rather condescendingly described in the eighteenth-century philosphes. Becker's experience is described by Gershoy, Leo in “Carl Becker on Progress and Power,” American Historical Review, LV (1949), 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41. Brinton, Crane, Ideas and Men (New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1950), p. 135Google Scholar; Meland, , Reawakening of Christian Faith, pp. 2, 65–66, and 73–75.Google Scholar

42. Ferguson, Wallace K., The Renaissance in Historical Thought (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1948), pp. 286–289, 295, 344–345, 355–356, 381, and 396Google Scholar; Brinton, , Ideas and Men, PP. 377 and 406–407.Google Scholar

43. Becker, Carl L., The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1932)Google Scholar.

44. Brinton, Clarence Crane, The Jacobins (New York: Macmillan Company, 1930)Google Scholar; Soltau, Roger Henry, French Political Thought in the Nineteenth Century (London: E. Benn, 1931).Google Scholar

45. Hayes, Canton J. H., Essays on Nationalism (New York: Macmillan Company, 1928), pp. 93–125.Google Scholar

46. Wells, H. G., God the Invisible King (New York: Macmillan Company, 1917).Google Scholar

47. Cf. Niebuhr, , Christ and Culture, p. 36.Google Scholar

48. One of the most interesting of such interpretations of Rousseau is by a sociologist: Nisbet, Robert A., The Quest for Community (New York: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar

49. Professor Cushing Strout has recently published an article on certain varieties of American humanism under the interesting title “The Twentieth-Century Enlightenment,” The American Political Science Review, XLIX (06, 1955), pp. 321–339.Google Scholar

50. Cf. Williams, , What Present-Day Theologians Are Thinking, p. 22Google Scholar; Brinton, , Ideas and Men, pp. 399–408.Google Scholar

51. The debate about man as sinner presupposed the common acceptance of his transcendent worth. Even when it has been most radically opposed, Christianity has furnished a kind of structure in the total culture. Cf. Meland, op cit., pp. 65–66 and 74–75.

52. Hopper, Stanley Romaine, The Crisis of Faith (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1944), pp. 46–48.Google Scholar

53. Crossman, R. H. S., “Towards a Philosophy of Socialism,” New Fabian Essays (London: Turnstile Press, 1953), p. 8.Google Scholar

54. Nicbuhr, , The Self and the Dramas of History, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar