Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:53:54.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

William Perkins's “A Reformed Catholic”: A Psycho-Cultural Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James C. Herbert
Affiliation:
director of governance study at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Extract

It is remarkable that study of William Perkins (1558–1602) has had so little impact on conventional interpretations of English history. Of the work of this great pastoral theologian, William Haller observed that “no books… were more often to be found upon the shelves of succeeding generations of preachers, and the name of no preacher recurs more often in later Puritan literature.” In an article which commented upon Perkins's undeserved obscurity, Louis Wright suggested that in Perkins's thought Max Weber would have found “pertinent illustrations” for the famous argument about Protestantism and capitalism. Historical scholarship generally appears to have followed Wright's suggestion, mining Perkins's works for “pertinent illustrations” of established outlooks. Perkins has been pressed into service in economic and political versions of Haller's neo-Foxian epic which describes religious forces gathering relentlessly toward a mid-seventeenth-century climax. Other historians, encountering Perkins's insistent defense of the established church, have portrayed him as an Elizabethan moderate of varying degrees of sincerity and importance. Ultimately, these unproductive readings rest on an assumed typology of Anglicanism and Puritanism which casts Puritan theology as sectarian and disruptive while reserving the culturally integrative role of a churchly religion for Anglicanism. However faithfully this typology represents the outcome of seventeenth-century English history, it may have impeded fruitful analysis of Perkins's thought.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haller, William, The Rise of Puritanism (New York, 1957), p. 65.Google Scholar

2. Wright, Louis B., “William Perkins: Elizabethan Apostle of ‘Practical Divinity’,” Huntington Library Quarterly 3 (06 1940): 182.Google Scholar

3. The panoramic interpretations include New, John F. H., Anglican and Puritan: The Basis of Their Opposition, 1558–1640 (Stanford, 1964);Google ScholarHill, Christopher, “William Perkins and the Poor,” Puritanism and Revolution (London, 1962);Google ScholarLittle, David, Religion, Order, and Law: A Study in Pre-Revolutionary England (New York, 1969);Google Scholar and Walzer, Michael, The Revolution of the Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics (New York, 1976).Google Scholar The contrasting view is represented By Sisson, Rosemary, “William Perkins, Apologist for the Elizabethan Church of England,” The Modern Language Review 47, no. 9 (10 1952): 495502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Ian, Breward, ed., “Introduction,” The Work of William Perkins (Appleford, Eng., 1970), p. 14.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., pp. 15, 23–25. See also Breward, Ian, “The Life and Theology of William Perkins,1558–1602” (Ph.D. diss., University of Manchester, 1963).Google Scholar

6. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and in no way reflect those of the Carnegie Foundation. I am grateful to the Folger Shakespeare Library for a grant which supported part of the research for this paper.

7. Perhaps the best approach to the general method of structural analysis developed in the works of Claude Levi-Strauss is Sperber, Dan, Rethinking Symbolism, trans. Morton, Alice L. (Cambridge, 1975),Google Scholar chap. 3.

8. Perkins, William, A Reformed Catholike (Cambridge, 1598).Google Scholar All references are to this widely available edition. Detailed comparison with the 1597 edition owned by the Folger Shakespeare Library discloses significant additions on pages 1, 134, 135, 144, 343, 344, and 360 as well as on the first page of “The Epistle.” A Reformed Catholike appeared in five editions as well as in the many collections of Perkins's works. The Jacobean controversy about A Reformed Catholike presents, in conventional terms of analysis, the anomaly of an elaborate establishment defense of the premier Puritan theologian. Perkins's book was attacked by the Roman Catholic William Bishop (1554–1624) and defended by Robert Abbot (1560–1617), brother of the Archbishop, who himself became Bishop of Salisbury. I have carried out a full analysis of this controversy.

9. Tyacke, Nicholas, “Puritanism, Arminianism, and Counter-Revolution,” in The Origins of the English Civil War, ed. Conrad, Russell (New York, 1973), pp. 119143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. [v].Google Scholar

11. William Bishop, D. B. P., The Reformation of a Catholic Deformed … The Former Part (n.p., 1604), p. 35.Google Scholar

12. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. 39.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 40.

14. Ibid., pp. 51, 53.

15. Ibid., title page; compare p. [ii] and p. 330.

16. Ibid., p. [ii].

17. Ibid., pp. 184, 207–208,66, 119.

18. Ibid., p. [ii].

19. Ibid., pp. 64–65.

20. Ibid., p. 65.

21. Ibid., p. 72.

22. Ibid., p. 72.

23. The background of Perkins's comparison is inevitably vague, but one specific candidate would be contemporary efforts to break entails in order to secure free alienation of land. Simpson, A. W. B., Introduction to the History of English Land Law (Oxford, 1961), pp. 118223.Google Scholar

24. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, pp. 7273.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., p.68.

26. Ibid., pp. 68–69.

27. Ibid., pp. 69–70. The imputation of human sin to Christ was not an incidental function of Perkins's system of thought. Perkins, William, An Exposition of the Symbol, in The Works…, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1609), 1: 192209,Google Scholar developed it extensively in the context of Christ's arraignment before Pilate.

28. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. 70.Google Scholar

29. Ibid.

30. According to Aristotle, species characteristics are realized in individuals by the variably successful male transmission of that form. Aristotle, De Partibus Animalium, 640a. Compare Ross, W. D., Aristotle (Cleveland, 1959), pp. 116127;Google Scholar and Gasking, Elizabeth, Investigations into Generation, 1651–1828 (Baltimore, 1967), pp. 1920, 29.Google Scholar For Perkins's Aristotelianism, see Breward, , “Introduction,” pp. 34.Google Scholar

31. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. 119.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., pp. 34–35, 31- 32. Indeed, death itself is explicitly taken to indicate the continuing presence of original sin.

33. Ibid., p. 122.

34. Ibid., pp. 207–208.

35. Ibid., p. 211.

36. Ibid., pp. 185–187.

37. Ibid., p. 304.

38. Ibid., pp. 187–188. Compare Perkins, An Exposition of the Symbol, 1: 305.

39. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. 185.Google Scholar For these notions of signs and motivation, see Barthes, Roland, Elements of Semiology, trans. Lavers, Annette and Smith, Colin (Boston, 1970), pp. 3842, 5052.Google Scholar

40. Perkins used the expression “Christ's body' gingerly so as to actually refer to the derivation of Christ's righteousness through his humanity. “And this is the cause, why not only in the preaching of the word, but also in the institution of the Lord's Supper, express mention is made, not only of Christ's merit, but also of his very body and blood, whereby the whole humanity is signified … (Perkins, , An Exposition of the Symbol, 1: 305)Google Scholar.

41. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, pp. 177179.Google Scholar

42. Ibid., p. 174.

43. Ibid., p. 173.

44. Ibid. Compare the argument that humanity's “inherent righteousness” or sanctification “serveth to declare” imputed righteousness (ibid., p. 66).

45. Ibid., p. 179.

46. Ibid., p. 182.

47. Ibid., pp. 175–176, 183–184.

48. Ibid., p. 184.

49. Ibid., p. [ii].

50. Ibid., p.360. Compare the Folger copy, p. 356.

51. Ibid., p.286.

52. Ibid., p. 286.

53. Ibid., p. 287.

54. Ibid., pp. 3–7, 333.

55. Ibid., p. 314.

56. Ibid., pp. 133, 150.

57. Ibid., pp. 134–135. This point was emphasized by a change from the original phrase, “Not of men but from God Himself” (Folger Library copy, p. 134).

58. Ibid., pp. 140, 144–145, 149–150.

59. Ibid., p.40.

60. Ibid., p. 300.

61. Einstein, Elizabeth L., “Some Conjectures About the Impact of Printing on Western Society and Thought: A Preliminary Report,” Journal of Modern History 40 (1968): 3031.Google Scholar

62. Ibid., p. 31.

63. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, pp. 4748.Google Scholar

64. Ibid., pp. 148–149.

65. Erikson, Erik, Childhood and Society (New York, 1963), pp. 7280.Google Scholar

66. Gardner, Howard, “From Mode to Symbol: Thoughts on the Genesis of the Arts,” British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1970): 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, pp. 38, 4445Google Scholar

68. For example, Perkins, , An Exposition of the Symbol, 1: 302.Google Scholar

69. Ibid., p. 283.

70. Perkins, , A Reformed Catholike, p. 315.Google Scholar

71. Ibid., p. 85.

72. Ibid., pp. 271- 272.