Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:43:01.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fighting Elections: Cross-Level Political Party Integration in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2010

Anna Lennox Esselment
Anna Lennox Esselment*
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University, King's University College
*
Anna Lennox Esselment, Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5; aesselment@wlu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Conventional wisdom about the structure of political parties in Canada has emphasized their confederal nature. In other words (and the New Democratic party excepted), parties with identical partisan complexions at the federal and provincial levels are thought to operate in “two political worlds.” This paper argues that election campaigns are a key integrating link between parties. How they fight elections reveals extensive cross-level co-operation, particularly through shared activists (local party activists, party staff and party professionals) and technological expertise. This has the effect of shrinking the space between party cousins and forges unity between them. While there are certain obstacles to electoral collaboration, there are also incentives for these parties to work to maintain and strengthen their ties with their partisan cousin at the other level. These findings make an important contribution by directly challenging the notion that Canada's federal system has led to increasingly disentangled political parties.

Résumé. L'opinion communément admise au sujet de la structure des partis politiques au Canada a mis l'accent sur leur nature confédérale. En d'autres termes (exception faite du Nouveau Parti démocratique), on considère en général que les partis à caractère partisan identique au palier fédéral et provincial fonctionnent dans «deux mondes politiques à part». Le présent article avance que les campagnes électorales constituent un facteur d'intégration clé entre les différents niveaux d'un parti. La façon dont un parti dispute une élection révèle un haut degré de coopération entre les organisations provinciales et fédérales, surtout du fait qu'ils partagent des militants communs (militants locaux, personnel politique et professionnels du parti) et leur expertise technologique. Ce phénomène tend à rétrécir l'espace entre cousins du même parti et à bâtir l'unité d'organisation entre les deux niveaux. Même s'il y a des obstacles inévitables à la collaboration électorale, les partis cousins ont de bonnes raisons de veiller à maintenir et à renforcer leurs liens réciproques. Ces conclusions apportent une contribution importante à l'étude des partis politiques, en contestant directement l'idée que le système fédéral au Canada a encouragé les partis politiques de même allégeance à mener leurs activités de manière indépendante.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 871 - 892
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakvis, Herman and Tanguay, Brian A.. 2008. “Federalism, Political Parties, and National Unity.” In Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, ed. Bakvis, Herman and Skogstad, Grace. 2nd ed.Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Edwin. 1965. “Federal Strains within a Canadian Party.” The Dalhousie Review 45 (3): 307–23.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1979. From Interstate to Intrastate Federalism in Canada. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen's University.Google Scholar
Camp, Dalton. 1970. Gentlemen, Players and Politicians. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Canada Networking Conference and Exhibition. 2008. Manning Centre for Building Democracy. www.manningcentre.ca. (July 12, 2008).Google Scholar
Carty, R.K. 1994. “The Federal Face of Canadian Party Membership.” In Parties and Federalism in Australia and Canada, ed. Sharman, Campbell and Bakvis, Herman. Canberra: Federalism Research Centre, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Coutts, Jane. 1999. “Federal grits no-shows no problem.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto). June 3, A8.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, R. 1991. “Links between Federal and Provincial Parties and Party Systems.” In Representation, Integration, and Political Parties in Canada, ed. Bakvis, Herman. Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing.Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna. 2007. “Canadian Political Parties and Integrating Links: An Undoing of Disentanglement?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Political Science Association, Fredericton NB.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna. 2009. “Family Matters: The Role of Partisanship in Federal–Provincial Relations in Canada.” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Findlay, Alan. 2005. “Guess who's stumping for federal cousins? Queen's park staffers hit hustings.” The Toronto Sun, December 4, p 39.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Tom. 2007. Harper's Team: Behind the Scenes in the Conservative Rise to Power. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, Gloria. 2005. “Younger blood flows in Tory war room.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), November 21, A5.Google Scholar
Galloway, Gloria. 2007. “Contest pits pedigree against incumbency.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 28, A8.Google Scholar
Government of Ontario. 2005. “McGuinty Renews Campaign to Narrow $23 Billion Gap”. http://www.premier.gov.on.ca/news/event.php?ItemID=4999&Lang=EN (March 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Howlett, Karen. 2005. “Despite differences, McGuinty to back Martin, Liberals.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), November 30, A11.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Warren. 2007. The War Room: Political Strategies for Business, NGOs, and Anyone Who Wants to Win. Toronto: The Dundurn Group.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian and Curry, B.. 2007. “PM set to reboot Parliament.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 5, A4.Google Scholar
Laschinger, John and Stevens, Geoffrey. 1992. Leaders & Lesser Mortals: Backroom Politics in Canada. Toronto : Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Daniel. 2006. “The Rock proves a hard place for Harper.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), October 16, A1.Google Scholar
Mackie, Richard. 2004. “Not our fault federal party lags.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), June 3, A10.Google Scholar
Noel, Sid. 2007. “Leaders' Entourages, Parties, and Patronage.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tanguay, A. Brian. 3rd ed.Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Painter, Martin. 1991. “Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: An Institutional Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“PM might not want McGuinty's support.” 2004. The Toronto Star (Toronto), May 24, A8.Google Scholar
“PM's comments draw fire.” 2006. CBC News. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2006/05/05/to-mcguintyharper20060505.html. (October 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Savoie, Donald J. 1999. Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, Anthony and Koop, Royce. 2005. Patterns of Federal–Provincial Party Memberships in Canada since 1993. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey. 1988. Spoils of Power: The Politics of Patronage. Toronto: Harper Collins Canada.Google Scholar
Smith, David E. 1975. Prairie Liberalism: The Liberal Party in Saskatchewan 1905–71. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, David K. and Carty, R. Kenneth. 2006. “Many Political Worlds? Provincial Parties and Party Systems.” In Provinces: Canadian Provincial Politics, ed. Dunn, Christopher. 2nd ed.Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Webb, Paul and Kolodny, Robin. 2006. “Professional Staff in Political Parties.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wells, Paul. 2006. Right Side Up: The Fall of Paul Martin and the Rise of Stephen Harper's New Conservatism. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Reginald. 1977. The Governing Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada, 1930–58. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehorn, Alan. 2004. “Jack Layton and the NDP: Gains but No Breakthrough.” In The Canadian General Election of 2004, ed. Pammett, Jon H. and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. and Carty, R. Ken. 2006. “Disconnected Competition in Canada.” In Devolution and Electoral Politics, ed. Hough, Dan and Jeffery, Charlie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Robert and Leuprecht, Christian. 2006. “Introduction: New Work, Background Themes, and Future Research about Municipal–Federal–Provincial Relations in Canada.” In Canada: The State of the Federation, 2004, ed. Young, Robert and Relations, Christian Leuprecht. Institution for Intergovernmental. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar