Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:49:12.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new trap-jawed ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Haidomyrmecini) from Canadian Late Cretaceous amber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2013

Ryan C. McKellar ,
James R.N. Glasier  and
Michael S. Engel
Ryan C. McKellar*
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology (Paleoentomology), Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States of America Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
James R.N. Glasier
Affiliation:
Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 814 General Services Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1
Michael S. Engel
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology (Paleoentomology), Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: ryan.mckellar@ku.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new genus and species are described within the extinct tribe Haidomyrmecini, and tentatively placed within the subfamily Sphecomyrminae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Haidoterminus cippusnew genus and species expands the distribution of the bizarre, exclusively Cretaceous, trap-jawed Haidomyrmecini beyond their previous records in mid-Cretaceous Burmese and French amber, and into Laurentia. The new material from the Grassy Lake, Alberta, Canada collecting locality also provides evidence that these highly specialised, likely arboreal, ants persisted for an additional 20 million years, reaching the Late Cretaceous. Morphological features of H. cippus, such as the presence of an elongate antennomere II (pedicel), further support the argument that Haidomyrmecini may not actually belong within the subfamily Sphecomyrminae, and may warrant recognition at the subfamily level or inclusion as a highly autapomorphic clade within another subfamily. Despite the introduction of new fossil material, and the clarity of preservation in Canadian amber, the mystery of how Haidomyrmecini fed remains unsolved.

Résumé

Nous décrivons un nouveau genre et une nouvelle espèce de la tribu fossile des Haidomyrmecini et les plaçons avec hésitation dans la sous-famille des Sphecomyrminae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Haidoterminus cippusnouveau genre et nouvelle espèce élargit la répartition des Haidomyrmecini à mâchoires en piège, insectes bizarres connus exclusivement du Crétacé, au-delà des récoltes signalées dans l'ambre de France et de Birmanie du Crétacé moyen jusque dans la Laurentie. Ces nouveaux spécimens provenant du site de récolte de Grassy Lake, Alberta, Canada, indiquent aussi que ces fourmis fortement spécialisées et vraisemblablement arboricoles ont persisté pendant 20 millions d'années supplémentaires pour atteindre de Crétacé supérieur. Des caractéristiques morphologiques de H. cippus, telles que la présence d'un antennomère II (pédicelle) allongé, fournissent des arguments supplémentaires à la thèse voulant que les Haidomyrmecini n'appartiennent pas vraiment à la sous-famille des Sphecomyrminae, mais qu'ils doivent être reconnus comme une sous-famille particulière ou alors être inclus comme un clade fortement autapomorphique dans une autre sous-famille. Malgré la découverte de ce nouveau matériel fossile et l'excellente qualité de sa conservation dans l'ambre canadien, le mystère du mode d'alimentation des Haidomyrmecini reste entier.

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 145 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 454 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barden, P.Grimaldi, D. 2012. Rediscovery of the bizarre Cretaceous ant Haidomyrmex Dlussky (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with two new species. American Museum Novitates, 3755: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Bolton, B. 2003. Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 71: 1–370.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M. 1975. Superfamily Formicoidea Latreille, 1802. Family Formicidae Latreille, 1802. In Hymenoptera Apocrita of the Mesozoic. Edited by A.P. Rasnitsyn. Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 147: 114–122. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M. 1983. A new family of Upper Cretaceous Hymenoptera: an “intermediate link” between the ants and the scolioids. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 3: 65–78. [In Russian, English translation in 1984, Paleontological Journal, 17: 63–76].Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M. 1987. New Formicoidea (Hymenoptera) of the Upper Cretaceous. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1: 131–135. [In Russian, English translation in 1988, Paleontological Journal, 21: 146–150].Google Scholar
Dlussky, G.M. 1996. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Burmese amber. Paleontological Journal, 30: 449–454.Google Scholar
Eberth, D.A.Deino, A.L. 1992. A geochronology of the nonmarine Judith River Formation of southern Alberta. In Mesozoic of the Western Interior: Abstracts for the Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Theme Meeting, Fort Collins, Colorado. Society for Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America. Pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
Emery, C. 1870. Studi mirmecologici. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 2: 193–201.Google Scholar
Engel, M.S.Grimaldi, D.A. 2005. Primitive new ants in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, New Jersey and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). American Museum Novitates, 3485: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erichson, W.F. 1842. Beitrag zur Insecten-Fauna von Vandiemensland, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der geographischen Verbreitung der Insecten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 8: 83–287.Google Scholar
Forel, A. 1890. Fourmis de Tunisie et de l'Algérie orientale. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 34: 61–76.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.B.Deino, A.L. 1989. The first radiometric ages from the Judith River Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Hill County, Montana. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 26: 1384–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet, H.Huber, J.T. 1993. Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D.Agosti, D. 2000. A formicine in New Jersey Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and early evolution of the ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97: 13678–13683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimaldi, D.A.Agosti, D., Carpenter, J.M. 1997. New and rediscovered primitive ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cretaceous amber from New Jersey, and their phylogenetics relationships. American Museum Novitates, 3208: 1–43.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A.Engel, M.S. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., Engel, M.S., Nascimbene, P. 2002. Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. American Museum Novitates, 3361: 1–72.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A., Shedrinsky, A., Wampler, T.P. 2000. A remarkable deposit of fossiliferous amber from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) of New Jersey. In Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Edited by D.A. Grimaldi. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. Pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B.Wilson, E.O. 1990. The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Delclòs, X., Briggs, D.E.G., Peñalver, E. 2004. Taphonomy of insects in carbonates and amber. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 203: 19–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKellar, R.C., Engel, M.S. 2012. Hymenoptera in Canadian Cretaceous amber (Insecta). Cretaceous Research, 35: 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKellar, R.C.Wolfe, A.P. 2010. Canadian amber. In Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Edited by D. Penney. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, United Kingdom. Pp. 149–166.Google Scholar
McKellar, R.C.Wolfe, A.P., Tappert, R., Muehlenbachs, K. 2008. Correlation between Grassy Lake and Cedar Lake ambers using infrared spectroscopy, stable isotopes, and palaeoentomology. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 45: 1061–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimbene, P.Silverstein, H. 2000. The preparation of fragile Cretaceous ambers for conservation and study of organismal inclusions. In Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Edited by D.A. Grimaldi. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. Pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Perrichot, V. 2004. Early Cretaceous amber from south-western France: insight into the Mesozoic litter fauna. Geologica Acta, 2: 9–22.Google Scholar
Perrichot, V., Lacau, S., Néraudeau, D., Nel, A. 2008a. Fossil evidence for the early ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften, 95: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrichot, V., Nel, A., Néraudeau, D., Lacau, S., Guyot, T. 2008b. New fossil ants in French Cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften, 95: 91–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrichot, V., Néraudeau, D., Nel, A., De Ploëg, G. 2007. A reassessment of the Cretaceous amber deposits from France and their palaeontological significance. African Invertebrates, 48: 213–227.Google Scholar
Perrichot, V., Néraudeau, D., Tafforeau, P. 2010. Charentese amber. In Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Edited by D. Penney. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, United Kingdom. Pp. 192–207.Google Scholar
Pike, E.M. 1995. Amber taphonomy and the Grassy Lake, Alberta, amber fauna. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Poinar, G.O. Jr, Lambert, J.B., Wu, Y. 2007. Araucarian source of fossiliferous Burmese amber: spectroscopic and anatomical evidence. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute Texas, 1: 449–455.Google Scholar
Ross, A., Mellish, C., York, P., Crighton, B. 2010. Burmese amber. In Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Edited by D. Penney. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, United Kingdom. Pp. 208–235.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A.R., Girard, V., Perrichot, V., Schönborn, W. 2010. Testate amoebae from a Cretaceous forest floor microbiocoenosis of France. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 57: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, G., Grimaldi, D.A., Harlow, G.E., Wang, J., Wang, J., Yang, M., et al. 2012. Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. Cretaceous Research, 37: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P.S. 2007. Phylogeny, classification, and species-level taxonomy of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 1668: 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O., Carpenter, F.M., Brown, W.L. Jr 1967. The first Mesozoic ants, with the description of a new subfamily. Psyche, 74: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar