Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:30:59.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microctonus aethiops (Nees) auctt. and Perilitus rutilus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), European Parasites of Sitona Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Conrad Loan  and
F. G. Holdaway
Conrad Loan
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Belleville, Ontario, Canada.
F. G. Holdaway
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 1, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Microctonus aethiops (Nees) auctt. (Fig. 1) and Perilitus rutilus (Nees) are parasites of adult Sitona weevils in Europe. They were released in Canada as control agents of the sweetclover weevil, Sitona cylindricollis Fahr. (Fig. 2). The immature stages and biology of the species were studied as a prerequisite to attempts at biological control. A similar investigation of the braconid Pygostolus falcatus (Nees) was completed (Loan and Holdaway, 1961). Jackson (1928) described some aspects of the biology of P. rutilus, and additional data are given in the present paper.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 93 , Issue 12 , December 1961 , pp. 1057 - 1079
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, P. A., and Parker, H. L.. 1950. Notes on parasites of Sitona in Europe with special reference to Campogaster exigua (Meig.). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 52: 251–258.Google Scholar
Cox, C. E. 1954. Handbook on Statistical Methods. Can. Dept. Agric. Processed Publ. No. 3.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. 1922. Bionomics of weevils of the genus Sitona injurious to leguminous crops in Britain. Pt. II. Sitona hispidula F., S. sulcifrons Thun. and S. crinita Herbst. Ann. appl. Biol. 9: 93–115.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. 1924. Insect parasites of the pea weevil. Nature 113: 353–354.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. 1928. The biology of Dinocampus (Perilitus) rutilus Nees, a braconid parasite of Sitona lineata L. Pt. I. Proc. zool. Soc. hond., 597–630.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, O. 1923. Beobachtungen und versuche zur frage der überwinterung und parasitierung von oelfruchtsschadlingen aus den gattungen Meligethes, Phyllotreta, Psylloides und Ceuthorrhynchus. Arb. biol. Abt. (Anst.-Reichsanst.), Berl. XIII: 109–169 (Abs. R.A.E.(A) XIII p. 26).Google Scholar
Loan, Conrad, and Holdaway, F. G.. 1961. Pygostolus falcatus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of Sitona species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Bull. ent. Res. 52: 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markkula, M. 1959. The biology and especially the oviposition of the Sitona Germ. (Col. Curculionidae) species occurring as pests of grassland legumes in Finland. Publ. Finn. St. Agric. Res. Bd. 178: 41–74.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. A. 1887. Monograph of British Braconidae. Pt. II. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land., 73–74.Google Scholar
Meyer, N. F. 1934. Schlupfwespen, die in Russland in den letzten jahren aus Schadlingen gezogen sind. Z. angew. Ent. 20: 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, H. C. F. 1931. Notes on some parasites reared from flea beetles of the genus Phyllotreta (Chrysomelidae). Ent. mon. Mag. 67: 82.Google Scholar
Short, J. R. T. 1952. The morphology of the head of larval Hymenoptera with special reference to the head of Ichneumonidae, including a classification of the final instar larvae of Braconidae. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 130: 27–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar