Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:36:45.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARABROCHYMENA LARIVIÈRE (HEMIPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE): SYSTEMATICS, NATURAL HISTORY, CHOROLOGICAL AFFINITIES, AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS, WITH A BIOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF PARABROCHYMENA AND BROCHYMENA AMYOT AND AUDINET-SERVILLE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marie-Claude Larivière
Marie-Claude Larivière
Affiliation:
Manaaki Whenua — Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Parabrochymena Larivière is reviewed. Parahrochymna inbio and P. ruckesi are newly described. Parabrochymena barberi dituta (Ruckes) is given specific rank. Two synonymies are established: Brochymena aculeata Distant = P. haedula (Stål), Brochymena cuspidata Distant = P. haedula (Stål). A lectotype is designated for P. haedula (Stål). Species groups are characterized, and a key to all taxa is presented for the first time. As appropriate, for each species of Parabrochymena, the following are provided: citation of original description, synonymies, type material, description, geographical distribution, taxonomic comments, natural history, and illustrations of important structural characters. Choroiogical affinities are presented and systematic relationships are hypothesized. A biogeographic analysis of Parabrochymena and Brochymena Amyot and Audinet-Serville is also presented.

Résumé

L’auteure révise le genre Parabrochymena. Deux nouvelles espèces, P. inbio et P. ruckesi, sont décrites. On élève P. barberi diluta (Ruckes) au rang d’espèce. On établit deux synonymies : Brochymena aculeata Distant = P. haedula (Stål), B. cuspidata Distant = P. haedula (Stål). On désigne un lectotype chez P. haedula (Stål). Des groupes d’espèces sont caractérisés chez Brochymena et un tableau de détermination des taxons est offert. L’auteure fournit, selon l’espèce pour Parabroehymena, la citation de la description originale, la synonymie, la description du matériel-type, une description, la distribution géographique, des commentaires taxonomiques, des données d’histoire naturelle et l’illustration des caractères structuraux importants. Les affinités chorologiques et une hypothèse des relations systématiques sont présentées. L’auteure fournit aussi une analyse biogéographique des genres Parabrochymena et Brochymena Amyot et Audinet-Serville.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 5 , October 1994 , pp. 1193 - 1250
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R.T., and Ball, G.E.. 1980. Synopsis of the Mexican taxa of the Loxandrus series (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 105: 481–476.Google Scholar
Amyot, C.J.B., and Audinet-Serville, J.G.. 1843. Histoire naturelle des Insectes Hémiptères. In “Suite à Buffon.” Fain et Thunot, Paris. 681 pp.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1881. On a parasite bred from the eggs of the orange tree plant bug; being another friend of the orange grower. Florida Agriculturist 4: 193.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1893. Monograph of the North American Prototrypidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 45: 1–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1948. Climate and evolution in western North America during middle Pliocene time. Evolution 2: 127–144.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1950. Evolution of desert vegetation in western North America. Publications of the Carnegie Institution 590: 215–306.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1958. Evolution of the Madro-Tertiary geoflora. Botanical Review 24: 433–509.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1959. Geological history. pp. 5–9 in Munz, P.A., and Keck, D.D. (Eds.), A California Flora. University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA. 1681 pp.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1926. Heteroptera or True Bugs of Eastern North America with Especial Reference to the Faunas of Indiana and Florida. Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN. 1116 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, J.H., and Gibson, A.C.. 1983. Biogeography. C.V. Mosby Co., Toronto, Ont.643 pp.Google Scholar
Cohn, T.J. 1965. The Arid-land Katydids of the North American Genus Neobarrettia (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): Their Systematics and a Reconstruction of their History. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 126: 179 pp.Google Scholar
Cuda, J.P., and McPherson, J.E.. 1976. Life history and laboratory rearing of Brochymena quadripustulata with descriptions of immature stages and additional notes on Brochymena arborea (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69: 977–983.Google Scholar
Dallas, W.S. 1851. List of Specimens of Hemipterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Pt. 1. Taylor and Francis Inc., London. 368 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1957. Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals. J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 675 pp.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. 1978. Plant Geography with Special Reference to North America. Academic Press, New York, NY. 338 pp.Google Scholar
Distant, W.L. 1880–1893. Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Volume I. In Goodman, and Salvin, (Eds.), Biologi Centrali-Americana. London. 462 pp. [1880: 1–88].Google Scholar
Distant, W.L. 1900. Contributions to a knowledge of the Rhynchota. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London (1900), (Series 4), pp. 665–697.Google Scholar
Dowdy, W.W. 1947. An ecological study of the Arthropoda of an oak–hickory forest with reference to stratification. Ecology 28: 418–439.Google Scholar
Dowdy, W.W. 1955. An hibernal study of Arthropoda with reference to hibernation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 48: 76–83.Google Scholar
Eger, J.E. Jr., 1981. Oviposition site preferences and related aspects of parasitism of Brochymena spp. by Trichopepla plumipes in College Station, Texas. Environmental Entomology 10: 468–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1970. A reclassification of bombardier beetles and a taxonomic revision of the North and Middle American species (Carabidae: Brachinida). Quaestiones Entomologicae 6: 4–215.Google Scholar
Esselbaugh, C.O. 1948. Notes on the bionomics of some midwestern Pentatomidae. Entomologica Americana 18: 1–73.Google Scholar
Evans, H.E. 1966. The comparative ethology and evolution of the sand wasps. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 526 pp.Google Scholar
Freitag, R. 1969. A revision of the species of Evarthrus LeConte (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae 5: 89–211.Google Scholar
Graham, A. 1964. Origin and evolution of the biota of southeastern North America: Evidence from the fossil plant record. Evolution 18: 571–585.Google Scholar
Graham, A. (Ed.). 1973. Vegetation and Vegetational History of Northern Latin America. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam. 393 pp.Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F.E. 1857. Ordre des Hémiptères, Latr. Première section. Hétéroptères, Latr. in Sagra's, M.R. Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de l'Ile de Cuba. Arthus Bertrand, Paris 7: 359–424.Google Scholar
Hall, E.R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. 2 vols. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 305 pp.Google Scholar
Harshberger, J.W. 1958. Phytogeographic Survey of North America. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, NY. 790 pp.Google Scholar
Hart, C.H. 1919. The Pentatomoidea of Illinois with Keys to the Nearctic Genera. Division of Natural History Survey of Illinois 13(7): 223 pp.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schaeffer, G.A.W. 1840. Die Wanzenartigen Insecten. C.H. Zeh'schen Buchhandlung, Nürnburg 5: 61–108.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R.L. 1971. The insects of Virginia: No. 4. Shield bugs (Hemiptera: Scutelleroidea: Scutelleridae, Corimelaenidae, Cydnidae, Pentatomidae). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Research Division Bulletin 67: 1–61.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F. 1969. Effects of the Pleistocene on North American insects. Annual Review of Entomology 14: 39–56.Google Scholar
Hungerford, H.B. 1958. Some interesting aspects of the world distribution and classification of aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera. pp. 333–348in Baker, E.C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Entomology, Montréal, Volume 1. Mortimer Limited, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
King, D.B. 1958. Evolution of modern surface features of western North America. pp. 3–60in Hubbs, C.L. (Ed.), Zoogeography. American Association for the Advancement of Science 51.Google Scholar
King, D.B. 1959. The Evolution of North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 189 pp.Google Scholar
Larivière, M.-C. 1992. Description of Parabrochymena, New Genus, and Redefinition and Review of Brochymena Amyot and Audinet-Serville (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), with Considerations on Natural History, Chorological Affinities and Evolutionary Relationships. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 163: 75 pp.Google Scholar
Larochelle, A. 1984. Les Punaises Terrestres (Hétéroptères: Géocorises) du Québec. Fabreries, Supplément 3. 513 pp.Google Scholar
Liebherr, J.K. 1986. Cladistic analysis of North American Platynini and revision of the Agonum extensicolle species group (Coleoptera: Carabidae). University of California Publications, Entomology 106: 1–198.Google Scholar
Little, E.L. Jr., 1976. Atlas of the United States Trees. Vol. 3, Minor Western Hardwoods. USDA Miscellaneous Publications 1314: 303 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, P.S. 1958. A biogeography of reptiles and amphibians in the Gomez Farias region, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 101: 5–102.Google Scholar
Martin, P.S., and Harrell, B.E.. 1957. The pleistocene history of temperate biotas in Mexico and eastern United States. Ecology 38: 468–480.Google Scholar
McPherson, J.E. 1982. The Pentatomidae (Hemiptera) of Northeastern North America with Emphasis on the Fauna of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Morafka, D.J. 1977. A Biogeographic Analysis of the Chihuahuan Desert through its Herpetofauna. W. Junk Publishing, The Hague. 313 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, P.L., and McPherson, J.E.. 1977. An annotated list of phytophagous insects collected on immature black walnut trees in southern Illinois. The Great Lakes Entomologist 10: 211–221.Google Scholar
Nixon, P.L., McPherson, J.E., and Cuda, J.P.. 1975. A list of the Scutelleroidea (Hemiptera) collected on immature black walnut trees in Southern Illinois with some notes on biology. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 68: 409–413.Google Scholar
Patton, J.L., and Smith, M.F.. 1981. Molecular evolution in Thomomys: Phyletic systematics, paraphyly, and rates of evolution. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, L.H. 1981. Ochlerini, a new tribe in Discocephalinae (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 89: 40–42.Google Scholar
Rosen, D.E. 1978. Vicariant patterns and historical explanation in biogeography. Systematic Zoology 27: 159–188.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, A.H. 1911. Insects and spiders in Spanish moss. Journal of Economic Entomology 4: 398–409.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1965. Pleistocene events and insects. pp. 585–593in Wright, H.E., and Frey, D.G. (Eds.), The Quaternary of the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 922 pp.Google Scholar
Ruckes, H. 1939 a. Three new species of Brochymena (Pentatomidae) from the United States and Mexico. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 34: 111–119.Google Scholar
Ruckes, H. 1939 b. Brochymena florida, a new species of pentatomid from Florida. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 34: 236–239.Google Scholar
Ruckes, H. 1947. Notes and keys to the genus Brochymena (Pentatomidae, Heteroptera). Entomologica Americana 26 (New Series): 143–238 (1946).Google Scholar
Ruckes, H. 1957. New species of Pentatomidae from North and South America (Heteroptera) I. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 52: 16–24.Google Scholar
Ruckes, H. 1961. Three New World halyine pentatomids (Hemiptera; Pentatomidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 68: 225–231 (1960).Google Scholar
Say, T. 1825. Descriptions of new hemipterous insects collected in the expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under command of Major Long. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 4: 307–345.Google Scholar
Slater, A. 1974. A preliminary analysis of the derivation of the Heteroptera fauna of the northeastern United States with special reference to the fauna of Connecticut. Memoirs of the Connecticut Entomological Society (1974): 145–213.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1862. Hemiptera Mexicana enumeravit species — que novas descripsit. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 23: 81–181.Google Scholar
Stoner, D. 1915. Preliminary notes on Iowa Pentatomoidea (Heterop.). Entomological News 26: 353–355.Google Scholar
Stoner, D. 1916. Distributional notes on some Iowa Pentatomoidea. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 23: 303–307.Google Scholar
Stoner, D. 1920. The Scutelleroidea of Iowa. University of Iowa Studies in Natural History 8: 1–140.Google Scholar
Torre-Bueno, J. de la. 1908. Hemiptera Heteroptera of Westchester County, N.Y. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 16: 223–238.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1894. A list of the Hemiptera of Buffalo and vicinity. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 5: 167–204.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1923. Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences to the Gulf of California in 1921. The Hemiptera (true bugs, etc.). Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, Fourth Series 12: 123–200.Google Scholar
Vickery, V.R. 1989. The biogeography of Canadian Grylloptera and Orthoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 389–424.Google Scholar
Ward, C.R., O'Brien, C.W., Foster, D.E., and Huddleston, E.W.. 1977. Annotated checklist of New World insects associated with Prosopis (mesquite). U.S.D.A. Technical Bulletin 1557: 1–115.Google Scholar
Watrous, L.E., and Wheeler, Q.D.. 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 1–11.Google Scholar
Watts, W.A. 1980. The late Quaternary vegetation history of the southeastern United States. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 387–408.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D.R. 1972. Classification, phylogeny, and zoogeography of Schizogenius Putzeys (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Scaritini). Quaestiones Entomologicae 8: 131–348.Google Scholar
Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 439 pp.Google Scholar