Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:26:25.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interference of β-eudesmol in nestmate recognition in Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2008

C.G.S. Marinho*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
T.M.C. Della Lucia
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
M.M.R. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
S.T.V. Magalhães
Affiliation:
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
R.N.C. Guedes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
G.N. Jham
Affiliation:
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 55 31 3899 4012 E-mail: marinho@insecta.ufv.br

Abstract

Leaf-cutter ant species (Atta spp.) are key pests of cultivated crops in the Neotropics, and recent studies have demonstrated that workers of Atta spp., particularly of Atta sexdens rubropilosa, exhibit aggressive behavior among nestmates when in contact with the sesquiterpene β-eudesmol, found in leaves of Eucalyptus maculata. However, the underlying mechanism sparking this behavior pattern has yet to be investigated. This work aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which this substance elicits aggression in workers of A. sexdens rubropilosa. The results, thus obtained, showed that β-eudesmol is able to modify the chemical composition of the workers cuticle, impairing nestmate recognition, triggering alarm behavior and leading to nestmate aggression.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P.R. (1995) Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy. 469 pp. Carol Stream, Illinois, USA, Allured Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Anjos, N. & Santana, D.L.Q. (1994) Alterações deletérias no comportamento de Atta laevigata (F. Smith) e Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), causadas por folhas de Eucalyptus spp. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 23, 2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attygalle, A.B., Jham, G.N., Svatos, A., Frighetto, R.T., Meinwald, J., Vilela, E.F. & Ferrara, F.A. (1996) (3E, 8Z, 11Z)−3,8,11-Tetradecatrienyl acetato: A major component of sex pheromone of tomato pest Scrobipalpuloides absoluta. Biorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 4, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attygalle, A.B., Gulab, N.J. & Morgan, E.D. (2006) Contents of the hypertrophied postpharyngeal gland of workers and soldiers of the fire ant Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). Sociobiology 47, 471482.Google Scholar
Bigi, M.F.M.A., Torkomian, V.L.V., Groote, S.T.C.S., Hebling, M.J.A., Bueno, O.C., Pagnocca, F.C., Fernandes, J.B.P., Vieira, P.C. & Silva, M.F.G.F. (2004) Activity of Ricinus communis (Euphorbiaceae) and ricinine against the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the symbiotic fungus Leucoagaricus gongylophorus. Pest Management Science 60, 933938.Google Scholar
Blum, M.S. (1969) Alarm pheromones. Annual Review of Entomology 14, 157180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buser, H.R., Arn, H., Guerin, P.A. & Rauscher, S. (1983) Determination of double bond position in mono-unsaturated acetates by mass spectrometry of dimethyl disulfide adducts. Anaytical Chemistry 55, 818822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delabie, J.H.C., Agosti, D. & Nascimento, I.C. (2000) Litter ant communities of the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest region. pp. 117in Agosti, D., Majer, J.D., Alonso, L. & Schultz, T. (Eds) Sampling Ground-Dwelling Ants: Case Studies from the Worlds' Rain Forests. (S.l.): School of Environmental Biology (Bulletin 18).Google Scholar
Della Lucia, T.M.C., Vilela, E.F., Anjos, N. & Moreira, D.D.O. (1993) Criação de formigas cortadeiras em laboratório. pp. 151162in Della Lucia, T.M.C. (Ed) As Formigas Cortadeiras. Brazil, M.G., Viçosa, Folha de Viçosa.Google Scholar
Francelino, M.R., Mendonça, A.L., Do Nascimento, R.R. & Santana, A.E.G. (2006) The mandibular gland secretions of the leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens rubropilosa and Atta opaciceps exhibit intercaste and intercolony variations. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 643656.Google Scholar
Francis, G.W. & Veland, K. (1981) Alkylthiolation for the determination of double-bond position in linear alkenes. Journal of Chromatography 219, 379384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, J.V., Cabrera, A. & Jaffé, K. (1999) Mandibular gland secretion in different castes of the leaf-cutter ant Atta laevigata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24, 24332444.Google Scholar
Hernández, J.V., Lopes, H. & Jaffé, K. (2002) Nestmate recognition signals of the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. Journal of Insect Physiology 48, 287295.Google Scholar
Hernández, J.V., Goitía, W., Osio, A., Cabrera, A., Lopez, H., Sainz, C. & Jaffé, K. (2006) Leaf-cutter ant species (Hymenoptera: Atta) differ in the types of cues used to differentiate between self and others. Animal Behaviour 71, 945952.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. 732 pp. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S.P. & Wiemer, D.F. (1983) Host plant selection by an Attini ant. pp. 133154in Jaisson, P. (Ed.) Social Insects in the Tropics, vol. 2. Paris, University of Paris.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S.P., Wiemer, D.F. & Adejare, A. (1983) An antifungal terpenoid defends a Neotropical tree (Hymeneae) against attack by fungus-growing ant (Atta). Oecologia 60, 321327.Google Scholar
Hughes, W.O.H., Howse, P.E., Vilela, E.F. & Goulson, D. (2001) The response of grass-cutting to natural and synthetic versions of their alarm pheromone. Physiological Entomology 26, 165172.Google Scholar
Jaffé, K. (1983) Chemical communication systems in the ant Atta cephalotes. pp 165180in Jaisson, P. (Ed.) Social Insects in the Tropics vol. 2. Paris, University of Paris.Google Scholar
Liang, D., Blomquist, G.J. & Silverman, J. (2001) Hydrocarbon-released nestmate aggression in the Argentine ant, Linepthema humile, following encounters with insect prey. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 129, 871882.Google Scholar
Marinho, C.G.S., Della Lucia, T.M.C., Guedes, R.N.C., Ribeiro, M.M.R. & Lima, E.R. (2005) β-eudesmol-induced aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 117, 8993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinho, C.G.S., Ribeiro, M.M.R., Della Lucia, T.M.C. & Guedes, R.N.C. (2006) Aggressive response of pest ant species to β-eudesmol (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 47, 445454.Google Scholar
Marsaro, A.L. Jr.,, Souza, R.C., Della Lucia, T.M.C., Fernandes, J.B., Silva, M.F.G.F. & Vieira, P.C. (2004) Behavioral changes in workers of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa induced by chemical components of Eucalyptus maculata leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 17711780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morini, M.S.C., Bueno, O.C., Bueno, F.C., Leite, A.C., Hebling, M.J.A., Pagnocca, F.C., Fernandes, J.B., Vieira, P.C. & Silva, M.F.G.F. (2005) Toxicity of sesame seed to leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 45, 195204.Google Scholar
North, R.D., House, P.E. & Jackson, C.W. (2000) Agonistic behavior of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa elicited by caryophyllene. Journal of Insects Behavior 13, 113.Google Scholar
Santana, D.L.Q. & Anjos, N. (1989) Resistência de Eucalyptus spp. a Atta sexdens rubropilosa e Atta laevigata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Árvore 13, 174181.Google Scholar
Souza, D.J., Della Lucia, T.M.C. & Lima, E.R. (2005) Queen adoption in colonies of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus molestans (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioural Processes 70, 6268.Google Scholar