Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:51:47.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of altitude on seasonal flight activity of Rhagoletis cerasi flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

O.B. Kovanci  and
B. Kovanci
O.B. Kovanci*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, Gorukle Kampusu, 16059 Bursa, Turkey
B. Kovanci
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, Gorukle Kampusu, 16059 Bursa, Turkey
*
*Fax: 90 (224) 442 80 77 E-mail: baris@uludag.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of altitudinal variation on the seasonal flight activity of Rhagoletis cerasi (Linnaeus) flies was evaluated along an altitudinal gradient from 150 to 1170 m in Mount Uludag, northwestern Turkey. The predicted dates of fly emergence, flight duration and dates of 5%, 50% and 95% cumulative fly catches at various altitudes were estimated from a degree-day model. Degree-day predictions were compared with those obtained from observations made with yellow sticky traps. The observed and predicted dates of appearance of adults were delayed by 1.4 and 2.0 days for every 100 m increase in altitude, respectively. The delay in phenology events was less at high altitudes than postulated by Hopkins’ bioclimatic law, whether observed or predicted. The average absolute difference in predicted and observed dates of cumulative percentage catch of adults was 4.9 and 3.0 days in 1997 and 1998, respectively, but these differences were not significant. Prolonged flight activity was predicted and observed at higher altitudes, but the flight period lasted significantly longer than predicted. The observed flight period varied from 29 to 43 days in 1997 and from 36 to 52 days in 1998 between the lowest and highest altitude on the transect. Altitudinal variation between geographically close locations should be taken into account to properly time monitoring activities and hence to manage R. cerasi populations more effectively.

Keywords

elevationEuropean cherry fruit flyflightphenologyyellow sticky traps
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 345 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahas, R., Aasa, A. & Menzel, A. (2002) Changes in the European spring phenology. International Journal of Climatology 22, 1727–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G. & Hilliard, J.R. (1969) Altitudinal and seasonal distribution of Orthoptera in the Rocky Mountains of northern Colorado. Ecological Monographs 39, 385–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aliniazee, M.T. (1976) Thermal unit requirements for determining adult emergence of the western cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Environmental Entomology 5, 397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C.R.B. & Miller, G.W. (1978) The effect of temperature on the post-diapause development on four geographical populations of the European cherry fruit fly (Rhagoletis cerasi). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 23, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J.D. & Dingle, H. (1986) Geographic variation in the effects of temperature on life-history traits in the large milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. Oecologia 69, 64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanckenhorn, W.U. (1997) Altitudinal life history variation in the dung flies Scathophaga stercoraria and Sepsis cynipsea. Oecologia 109, 342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boller, E.F. & Bush, G.L. (1974) Evidence for genetic variation in populations of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on physiological parameters and hybridization experiments. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 17, 279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, J.C., Horobin, J.C., Butterfield, J. & Smith, G.R.J. (1976) The maintenance of annual life-cycles in two species of Tipulidae (Diptera); a field study relating development, temperature and altitude. Journal of Animal Ecology 45, 215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, H. (1976) On the infestation of cherry fruits by the cherry fruit fly (Rhagoletis cerasi L.). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 83, 53–58Google Scholar
Feron, M. (1952) Méthode d' avertissement utilisée en Suisse dans la lutte contre la mouche des cerises. Phytoma 5, 8–10Google Scholar
Fielding, C.A., Whittaker, J.B., Butterfield, J.E.L. & Coulson, J.C. (1999) Predicting responses to climate change: the effect of altitude and latitude on the phenology of the spittlebug Neophilaenus lineatus. Functional Ecology 13, 65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Colbrie, P., Busch-Petersen, E. (1989) Pest status: temperate Europe and West Asia. pp. 91–99 in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G.H.S. World crop pests, Vol. 3A. Fruit flies: biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1989) Ecology; movements of tephritid fruit flies. pp. 209–219 in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G.H.S. (Eds) World crop pests, Vol. 3A. Fruit flies: biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Fry, K.E. (1983) Heat-unit calculations in cotton crop and insect models. 23 pp. USDA-ARS Advances in Agricultural Technology Western Series No. 23, Oakland, California.Google Scholar
Haisch, A. (1975) Observations on the flying behaviour of the European cherry fruit fly (Rhagoletis cerasi L.). pp. 191–198 in Proceedings of the IAEA-FAO symposium on the sterility principle for insect control, 22–26 July 1974, Innsbruck, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. (1919) The bioclimatic law as applied to entomological research and farm practice. Scientific Monthly 8, 496–513Google Scholar
Katsoyannos, B.I., Boller, E.F. & Benz, G. (1986) The behaviour of the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L., in its host-plant selection and its dispersal. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 59, 315–335Google Scholar
Kovanci, O.B. (1998) Investigations on the adult population fluctuations and infestation levels of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and the effectiveness of control measures applied in some cherry orchards in Bursa. 132 pp. MSc. thesis, Uludag University Applied Sciences Institute, Bursa (in Turkish, English abstract). Bursa.Google Scholar
Leclercq, M. (1979) Trypetidae and Sciomyzidae (Diptera) of the Pyrenees (Province of Huesca). Publicaciones del Centro Pirenaico de Biologia Experimental 8, 99–101Google Scholar
Leski, R. (1963) Studies on the biology and ecology of the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Dipt., Trypetidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, Seria B, 153–240 (in Polish, English abstract).Google Scholar
Mani, M.A. (1962) Introduction to high altitude entomology. 302 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Muller, W. (1970) Agro-meteorological investigations on the date of first emergence of the cherry fruit-fly (Rhagoletis cerasi L.) in Austria. Pflanzenschutzberichte 41, 193–209Google Scholar
Powell, J.A. & Logan, J.A. (2005) Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature-driven life cycles. Theoretical Population Biology 67, 161–179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruess, K.P. (1983) Day-degree methods for pest management. Environmental Entomology 12, 613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, M.G.M. (1982) The dynamics of an insect population throughout its altitudinal distribution: Coleophora alticolella (Lepidoptera). Journal of Animal Ecology 51, 993–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reissig, W.H., Barnard, J., Weires, R.W., Glass, E.H. & Dean, R.W. (1979) Prediction of apple maggot fly emergence from thermal unit accumulation. Environmental Entomology 8, 51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. (2001) SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Smith, R.J., Hines, A., Richmond, S., Merrick, M., Drew, A. & Fargo, R. (2000) Altitudinal variation in body size and population density of Nicrophorus investigator (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Environmental Entomology 29, 290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, T.H. & Menzel, A. (2002) Observed changes in seasons: an overview. International Journal of Climatology 22, 1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, T.H., Buse, A. & Gadsen, R.J. (1995) Life strategies of Carabus problematicus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at different altitudes on Snowdon, North Wales. Journal of Zoology 236, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M.J., Tauber, C.A. & Masaki, S. (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. 411 pp. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, O.P., Niemelä, P. & Keränen, J. (2000) Growth and development of a generalist insect herbivore, Operophtera brumata, on original and alternative host plants. Oecologia 122, 529–536CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallo, V., Remund, U. & Boller, E.F. (1976) Storage conditions of stockpiled diapausing pupae of Rhagoletis cerasi for obtaining high emergence rates. Entomophaga 21, 251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kirk, J.R. & Aliniazee, M.T. (1982) Diapause development in the western cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis indifferens Curran (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 93, 440–445Google Scholar
Walther, G.R., Post, E. & Convey, P. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, L., Tucker, C.J., Kaufmann, R.K., Slayback, D., Shabanov, N.V. & Myneni, R.B. (2001) Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 20069–20083CrossRefGoogle Scholar