Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:51:05.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host selection and strain occurrence in Apanteles flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its bearing on biological control of graminaceous stem-borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. I. Mohyuddin ,
C. Inayatullah  and
E. G. King
A. I. Mohyuddin
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control. P.O. Box 8, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
C. Inayatullah
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control. P.O. Box 8, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
E. G. King
Affiliation:
Bioenvironmental Insect Control Laboratory, P.O. Box 225, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of the Pakistan strain of Apanteles flavipes (Cam.) (which originates from Japan and is maintained on larvae of Chilo partellus (Swinh.) reared on maize) were readily attracted to maize stems but not to sugar-cane stems in the laboratory. Ovipositor probing occurred in the presence of unwashed host larvae, particularly of C. partellus and/or frass from host larvae fed on maize. Ovipositor probing did not occur in the presence of dried frass, dried frass that had been remoistened with water or frass from C. partellus fed on a diet of gram (Cicer arietinum) flour. The Pakistan strain of A. flavipes is morphologically identical to a strain of A. flavipes imported from India into Florida and established on Diatraea saccharalis (F.) fed on a soyabean flour-wheat germ diet. Reciprocal crosses between the two strains (Pakistan and USA) and between the F1, adults produced both male and female progeny. Nevertheless, behavioural differences between the strains were found in laboratory tests in that the USA strain responded more strongly to larvae of Acigona steniellus (Hmps.) fed on sugar-cane, was more attracted to sugar-cane stalks than to maize stalks and was not encapsulated by D. saccharalis larvae, whereas at least one-fifth of the Pakistan strain larvae were encapsulated. The existence of different strains of Apanteles flavipes adapted to different graminaceous crops suggests that parasite plant preference as well as host preference and suitability must be considered during attempts to introduce exotic parasites. It is recommended that A. flavipes strains adapted to sugar-cane be introduced into Pakistan for establishment on stem-borers of sugar“-cane.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 575 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M. M., Beg, M. N. & Ghani, M. A. (1972). Introduction of Apanteles spp. against graminaceous borers into Pakistan.—Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control no. 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
Alam, M. M., Bennett, F. D. & Carl, K. P. (1971). Biological control of Diatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados by Apanteles flavipes Cam. and Lixophaga diatraeae T.T.—Entomophaga 16, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindra, O. S. & Chand, N. (1973). Studies on the life-history of Apanteles flavipes (Cameron) and trial with it for controlling the Gurdaspur borer of sugarcane, Bissetia steniella (Hampson) in the Punjab.—Indian Sug. 23, 1–5.Google Scholar
Charpentier, L. J., Gifford, J. R., Summers, T. E. & Jackson, R. D. (1972).Biological control of sugarcane insects in continental United States—a historical review.—pp. 466–476in Henderson, M. T. (Ed.). Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Fourteenth Congress, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 22–November 5, 1971.—1771 pp. New Orleans, USA, Exec. Comm. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technologists.Google Scholar
CIBC (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control) (1979). Report of work carried out April 1978–March 1979.—87 pp. Farnham Royal, Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
CIBC (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control) (1980). Report of work carried out April 1979–March 1980.—78 pp. Farnham Royal, Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
Dang, K., Mohini, A. & Jotwani, M. G. (1970). A simple improved diet for mass rearing of sorghum stem borer, Chilo zonellus Swinhoe.—Indian J. Ent. 32, 130–133.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. W., Huffman, F. R. & Smith, J. W. Jr. (1979). Introduction and establishment of Apanteles flavipes (Hym.: Braconidae) on Diatraea saccharalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) in Texas.—Entomophaga 24, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greathead, D. J. (1971). A review of biological control in the Ethiopian Region.—Tech. Commun. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control no. 5, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Haydak, M. H. (1936). A food for rearing laboratory insects.—J. econ. Ent. 29, 1026.Google Scholar
King, E. G., Hartley, G. G., Martin, D. F., Smith, J. W., Summers, T. E. & Jackson, R. D. (1979). Production of the tachinid Lixophaga diatraeae on its natural host, the sugarcane borer, and on an unnatural host, the greater wax moth.—16 pp. Sci. & Educ. Admn., U.S. Dep. Agric. (Advances in Agricultural Technology no. AAT-S-3).Google Scholar
Lewis, W. J. & Jones, R. L. (1971). Substance that stimulates host-seeking by Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of Heliothis species.—Ann.ent. Soc. Am. 64, 471–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. J. (1971). Comparative biology and ecology of Apanteles flavipes (Cam.) and A. sesamiae Cam. as parasites of graminaceous borers.—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. (1972). Distribution, biology and ecology of Dentichasmias busseolae Heinr. (Hym., Ichneumonidae), a pupal parasite of graminaceous stem-borers (Lep., Pyralidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. (1978). The scope of biological control of sugarcane borers in Pakistan.—pp.29–39in Qureshi, M. A. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Pakistan Society of Sugar Technologists, Seminar on Plant Protection (Sugarcane), Lahore, May 17–May 18, 1978. Pakistan Society of Sugar Technologists.Google Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. & Shah, S. (1977) Biological Control of Mythimna separata (Lep.: Noctuidae) in New Zealand and its bearing on biological control strategy.—Entomophaga 22, 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, L. G. (1955). Host preferences of Drino bohemica Mesn. (Diptera: Tachinidae), with particular reference to olfactory responses.—Can. Ent. 87, 509–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, D. A. & Lewis, W. J. (1976). Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions.—J. chem. Ecol. 2, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, C. E. F., Lima, R. O. R. & Boas, A. M. V. (1977). Introducao e adaptacao de Apanteles flavipes Cam. (Hym., Braconidae), parasito da Diatraea spp. nos. estados de Pernambuco, Paraiba e Rio Grande do Borte.—Brazil açuc. 89, 49–56.Google Scholar
Roth, J. P., King, E. G. & Thompson, A. C. (1978). Host location behavior by the tachinid, Lixophaga diatraeae.—Environ. Entomol. 7, 794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauls, C. E., Nordlund, D. A. & Lewis, W. J. (1979). Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects. VIII. Effect of diet on the kairomonal activity of frass from Heliothis zea (Boddie) larvae for Microplitis croceipes (Cresson).—J. chem. Ecol. 5, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S. B.(1976). Host selection by insect parasitoids.—A. Rev. Ent. 21, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, C. (1965). Notes on the Apanteles flavipes complex (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Mushi 38, 111–115.Google Scholar