Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:58:03.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudinal dimensions of food choice and nutrient intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Margo E. Barker
Affiliation:
Centre for Human Nutrition, University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU
Kate A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Centre for Health and Social Research and Department of Mathematics, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 ISA
Sally I. McClean
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 ISA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A diet low in fat and rich in fibre has been recommended to optimize general health and in particular cardiovascular health. Health attitudes to fat and fibre were studied in relation to food and nutrient intake and sociocultural and lifestyle factors amongst the general population of Northern Ireland. The study population comprised 592 adults aged 16–64 years; health attitudes to fat and fibre were assessed by questionnaire (based on a social psychological model, which adjusted for taste and convenience factors). Dietary intake was estimated using the weighed inventory technique. Fat-phobic and fibre-philic attitudes were more prevalent in women than men. Fat-phobic attitudes in women were inversely related to intake of fat through a reduced intake of chips, butter and sausages. In contrast, men's fat-phobic attitudes were not strongly correlated with fat intake; consumption of chips and sausages was negatively associated with fat-phobic attitudes, but cake/biscuit, buns/pastries and milk consumption was positively associated with fat-phobic attitudes. Fibre-philic attitudes were positively associated with dietary fibre intake; intakes of potatoes, vegetables, wholemeal bread and breakfast cereal were positively associated with fibre-philic attitudes. There were clear sociocultural and lifestyle differences in relation to dietary attitude. These findings have implications for campaigns designed to effect population dietary change.

Type
Attitudes and diet
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1995

References

Barker, M. E., McClean, S. I., McKenna, P. G., Reid, N. G., Strain, J. J., Thompson, K. A., Williamson, A. P. & Wright, M. E. (1989). Diet, Lifestyle and Health in Northern Ireland. A Report to the Health Promotion Trust. Coleraine: University of Ulster.Google Scholar
Barker, M. E., McClean, S. I., Thompson, K. A. & Reid, N. G. (1990). Dietary behaviours and sociocultural demographics in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 319329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, M. E. & Thompson, K. A. (1993). Nutrition and health in Northern Ireland. In Social Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Third Report, pp. 78101 [Stringer, P. and Robinson, G., editors]. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
Blaxter, M. (1990). Health and Lifestyles. London: Tavistock/Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, N. & Kerr, M. (1988). Women, Food and Families. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1992). The Health of the Nation. A Strategy for Health in England. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to the Theory of Reasoned Action. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gallacher, J. & Bennett, G. (1990). Relations of attitudes to coronary risk behaviour in middle aged men. In Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Health Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society, Birmingham 1988, pp. 7074. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lloyd, H., Paisley, C. & Mela, D. J. (1993). Changing to a reduced fat diet: attitudes and beliefs of UK consumers. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 361373.Google ScholarPubMed
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1980). Classification of Occupations. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. & Stockley, L. (1985). Fat consumption and attitudes towards food with a high fat content. Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 39A, 431442.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. & Stockley, L. (1987). Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and fat consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 87, 615619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strain, J. J., Thompson, K. A. & Barker, M. E. (1991). Dietary intakes of smokers and non-smokers in the Northern Ireland population. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51, 101 A.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. L., Margetts, B. M., Wood, D. A. & Jackson, A. A. (1992). Cigarette smoking and food and nutrient intakes in relation to coronary heart disease. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 131152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towler, G. & Shepherd, R. (1992). Application of Fishbein and Ajzen's expectancy model to understanding fat intake. Appetite 18, 1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuorila, H. (1987). Selection of milks with varying fat contents and related overall liking, attitudes, norms and intentions. Appetite 8, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiles, S. J., Nettleton, P. A., Black, A. E. & Paul, A. A. (1980). The nutrient composition of some cooked dishes eaten in Britain: a supplementary food composition table. Journal of Human Nutrition 34, 189224.Google Scholar